Stop Asking Me About Guest Articles

Seriously, just stop. I won't participate in your content marketing attempts.

I am getting this request more and more often - to the tune of multiple emails a week at this point. It usually starts friendly enough - friendly enough to that I know the sender isn’t a robot, they’ve very clearly looked at some of my pages. But then the pitch starts: “I’d like to contribute to your website an article on X” or “I’d be delighted to contribute to your website on this topic.” Usually promising to do so for free.

So I want to be very clear about my position on guest articles:

I am NOT interested in guest articles. Not for paid. Not for free. No matter what the topic. I am not interested in any article not written 100% by me. Not now. Not ever.

First, I am on my third decade doing web development. I cut my teeth during the first dot-com boom. I’ve been around, I’ve seen some things. In all that time there is one inescapable lesson I have learned: nothing is free. Everything has a cost, even if that cost is not immediately apparent to an untrained reader. A guest post may be “free” to me, but somebody is paying you to write it, and they are expecting a return on that payment. That means anything you write “for me” will be, at best, a weak attempt at steering SEO to your site. At worst, it will be a straight up advertisement and riddled with affiliate marketing links.

If you are writing for me “for free” then I am not your customer. I am, at best, just another marketing funnel for you to fill.

Second, while this is not my first blog - I was a heavy LiveJournal user during college - it is by a fair bit my longest running one. I’ve been posting here for more than 15 years now. And with that amount of time, and with the number of articles that have been linked to various places like Reddit and Stack Overflow, it doubtless has a lot of SEO juice for some very specific keywords. And that make it an inviting target for people looking to take advantage of that.

I get what’s going on here: this is content marketing. Google’s algorithm changes over the last few years have started preferring “organic, human content” and you’re hoping I’ll place your content on my site so that Google will index it faster, increasing clicks to your client and, ultimately, sales for them and probably a commission for you. Sorry, but I am not going to “help” you with that, especially because not a single person who has written me so far has been honest enough to tell me that this is what they are trying to do.

And if you are not going to be honest with me about your motives for wanting to send me a “guest article,” why should I trust anything that article says?

Like I said, I’ve been around this long enough to easily pick out attempts to game search engine results (which is what most “SEO” is). I do very little “SEO” on this site beyond what is necessary to make the content relevant to actual human beings; it’s just incidental that doing so also makes Google happy. I have been on both sides of this, and I am choosing to opt out of this game. Sorry, I know that sucks for you, but you will have to find somewhere else to try to game Google. I am not going to help you with that.

If I do it even once, I will do it again and again. And before long this is just another SEO mill full of low-quality mass-produced crap articles that are completely useless to a regular human being. I refuse to allow that to happen, and I refuse to cede control of my site to others, to use 15+ years of built-up goodwill, as just another marketing funnel to sell SaaS subscriptions or trash products. I refuse to compromise my morals.

This is my blog and my very own personal expression of the IndieWeb movement. There are no ads here, and no affiliate marketing. I don’t track people. I am not even selling things so I could not possibly care less about “lost sales.” The closest I get is asking for donations if people enjoy the content. I know this may seem weird, but not everyone and everything on the Internet is about making money. I write because it’s fun and everything posted here is 100% my words. It has been that way since 2007, and it will continue to be that way as long as I am able to write.

So consider this post a digital no soliciting sign. To reiterate, I am not interested in guest articles. No, seriously, yours is not the exception.

For the Non-Marketing People

This is a personal blog, and I absolutely get multiple emails a week from people wanting to put content on it solely because it’s been around for ages. It’s a nearly 20 year old domain and nearly 15 years of unique, continuous content. I am saying no to these “offers,” but I guessing that a lot of people don’t.

So if you come across a blog post elsewhere that seems out of place, of poor quality, or overly-eager to get you to use some product or service, you are looking at content marketing.

Question everything.

About the Author

Hi, I'm Rob! I'm a blogger and software developer. I wrote petfeedd, dystill, and various other projects and libraries. I'm into electronics, general hackery, and model trains and airplanes. I am based in Huntsville, Alabama, USA.

About Me · Contact Me · Don't Hire Isaiah Armstrong

Did this article help you out?

I don't earn any money from this site.

I run no ads, sell no products and participate in no affiliate programs. I do not accept gifts in exchange for articles, guest articles or link exchanges. I don't track you or sell your data. The only third-party Javascript on this website is Google Analytics.

In general I run this site very much like a 1990s homepage or early 2000s personal blog, meaning that I do this solely because it's fun! I enjoy writing and sharing what I learn.

If you found this article helpful and want to show your appreciation, a tip or donation would be very welcome. Feel free to choose from the options below.

Comments (0)

Interested in why you can't leave comments on my blog? Read the article about why comments are uniquely terrible and need to die. If you are still interested in commenting on this article, feel free to reach out to me directly and/or share it on social media.

Contact Me
Share It

Interested in reading more?

Linux

Do Version Numbers Matter?

The recent announcement by Linus Torvalds that the next release of Linux will be 3.0 has provoked rather furious discussion around the Internets about whether or not the incrementing of the version number is warranted. Linus himself has said that “absolutely nothing” has changed. “It will get released close enough to the 20-year mark, which is excuse enough for me, although honestly, the real reason is just that I can no longer comfortably count as high as 40.” This got me to thinking about the nature of version numbers. Once upon a time (when versions were driven more by engineers and convention, and less by marketing), a version number meant something. Major, minor, revision. A major new release that modified significant portions of the code from the previous release incremented a major version number. Version numbers less than 0 were beta releases. Linux has been at 2.x since 1996, and at 2.6.x since 2003. Mac OS has been at 10.x since 2001 (even though the current version of OS X is significantly different from the original release in 2001). Meanwhile, Google Chrome has blasted through major 11 “versions” in three years. Mozilla is planning to release versions 5, 6, and 7 of Firefox this year. You can’t tell me that they are going to change major parts of Firefox three times this year. In this case, version numbers are purely being driven by marketing. They need to “catch up” to Chrome and Internet Explorer. But we live in a different world now. One where, arguably, version numbers are becoming less and less important. The growth of “app stores,” I think, is desensitizing your average user to a version number. While apps in the app store still have versions, I couldn’t tell you what “version” any of the apps on my iPhone are (other than the OS), and I bet you can’t either. Any of the apps I’ve installed from the Mac App Store I could not tell you the version of them. I just know that, when I see the number on the icon, I know I need to do updates. The updates happen, and I get a new version with whatever new features are there (or, in the case of the Twitter app, whatever features have been removed). Then there are web apps which are versionless. What version of Gmail do you use? You don’t. You use Gmail. Sure, there’s probably a revision number or something in the background, but the user has no clue what version they’re using. And they don’t need to, because there’s no action they need to take. So version are numbered in a wide variety of ways depending on the product and overall seem to be becoming less important as the growth of broadband, “app stores,” web apps, and automatic updates make thinking about version numbers less important. So why does it matter if Linus ups Linux to 3.0? Ultimately, it’s just a number.
Read More
Ramblings

A Fresh New Look

Welcome to the new, freshly redesigned robpeck.com! It’s amazing how you can become used to a design. It becomes like a warm coat. You love the predictability, you spent a lot of time getting the fonts right, getting the layour right, and everything is just perfect. That was the case with this site, that was pretty much exactly how it was way back when I migrated the site from Wordpress to Jekyll in 2013. To put that into perspective, my daughter was not even a year old yet. Barack Obama was just one year into his second term, the iPhone 5S had just dropped a month earlier, the first 4K TVs were shown off at CES. A long time has passed. And then the years pass. New devices and browsers appear. New technologies become available, and cruft builds up. In this case, a simple task of “I need to add a box to the site so that people will quit trying to use the comments for tech support and go to Github instead” became a full scale burn it down and start again redesign. So, aside from the new design, what else has changed?
Read More